Skip to content

HSTS vs Oxygen

Based on 2488 and 1 real audits

View HSTS details | View Oxygen details
MetricHSTSOxygenWinner
Performance4861Oxygen
Accessibility8984HSTS
Best Practices8796Oxygen
SEO9185HSTS
Security6983Oxygen
TTFB354ms727msHSTS
Composite7583Oxygen
Performance
HSTS
48
Oxygen
61
Accessibility
HSTS
89
Oxygen
84
Security
HSTS
69
Oxygen
83
SEO
HSTS
91
Oxygen
85
Composite
HSTS
75
Oxygen
83

Oxygen outperforms HSTS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (83 vs 75). HSTS leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Oxygen

Choose Oxygen when your primary concern is security and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2488 audited HSTS sites and 1 audited Oxygen sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Oxygen?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Oxygen sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (61 vs 48 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Oxygen?
Oxygen sites score higher on security analysis (83 vs 69 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Oxygen?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Oxygen?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 85 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Oxygen?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (354 ms vs 727 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Oxygen for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Oxygen scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback