Skip to content

HSTS vs PerimeterX

Based on 3016 and 24 real audits

View HSTS details | View PerimeterX details
MetricHSTSPerimeterXWinner
Performance5231HSTS
Accessibility8991PerimeterX
Best Practices8979HSTS
SEO9194PerimeterX
Security7266HSTS
TTFB385ms203msPerimeterX
Composite7771HSTS
Performance
HSTS
52
PerimeterX
31
Accessibility
HSTS
89
PerimeterX
91
Security
HSTS
72
PerimeterX
66
SEO
HSTS
91
PerimeterX
94
Composite
HSTS
77
PerimeterX
71

HSTS outperforms PerimeterX in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 71). PerimeterX leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose PerimeterX

Choose PerimeterX when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3016 audited HSTS sites and 24 audited PerimeterX sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or PerimeterX?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 31 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or PerimeterX?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (72 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or PerimeterX?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor PerimeterX (91 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or PerimeterX?
PerimeterX sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or PerimeterX?
PerimeterX sites show lower Time to First Byte (203 ms vs 385 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or PerimeterX for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback