Based on 3294 and 37 real audits
| Metric | HSTS | Plausible Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 52 | 56 | Plausible Analytics |
| Accessibility | 90 | 87 | HSTS |
| Best Practices | 89 | 89 | Tie |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 73 | 63 | HSTS |
| TTFB | 403ms | 203ms | Plausible Analytics |
| Composite | 78 | 74 | HSTS |
HSTS outperforms Plausible Analytics in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 74). Plausible Analytics leads in performance, TTFB.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Plausible Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3294 audited HSTS sites and 37 audited Plausible Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback