Skip to content

HSTS vs Plone

Based on 2556 and 7 real audits

View HSTS details | View Plone details
MetricHSTSPloneWinner
Performance4947HSTS
Accessibility8986HSTS
Best Practices8889Plone
SEO9194Plone
Security7066HSTS
TTFB364ms764msHSTS
Composite7572HSTS
Performance
HSTS
49
Plone
47
Accessibility
HSTS
89
Plone
86
Security
HSTS
70
Plone
66
SEO
HSTS
91
Plone
94
Composite
HSTS
75
Plone
72

HSTS outperforms Plone in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 72). Plone leads in best practices, SEO.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Plone

Choose Plone when your primary concern is SEO and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2556 audited HSTS sites and 7 audited Plone sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Plone?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 47 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Plone?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Plone?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Plone?
Plone sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Plone?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (364 ms vs 764 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Plone for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback