Skip to content

HSTS vs Popper

Based on 2488 and 114 real audits

View HSTS details | View Popper details
MetricHSTSPopperWinner
Performance4844HSTS
Accessibility8988HSTS
Best Practices8788Popper
SEO9189HSTS
Security6964HSTS
TTFB354ms298msPopper
Composite7573HSTS
Performance
HSTS
48
Popper
44
Accessibility
HSTS
89
Popper
88
Security
HSTS
69
Popper
64
SEO
HSTS
91
Popper
89
Composite
HSTS
75
Popper
73

HSTS outperforms Popper in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Popper leads in best practices, TTFB.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is security and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Popper

Choose Popper when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2488 audited HSTS sites and 114 audited Popper sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Popper?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 44 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Popper?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Popper?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Popper?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Popper?
Popper sites show lower Time to First Byte (298 ms vs 354 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Popper for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback