Skip to content

HSTS vs Popper

Based on 3295 and 156 real audits

View HSTS details | View Popper details
MetricHSTSPopperWinner
Performance5249HSTS
Accessibility9088HSTS
Best Practices8990Popper
SEO9290HSTS
Security7369HSTS
TTFB403ms418msHSTS
Composite7875HSTS
Performance
HSTS
52
Popper
49
Accessibility
HSTS
90
Popper
88
Security
HSTS
73
Popper
69
SEO
HSTS
92
Popper
90
Composite
HSTS
78
Popper
75

HSTS outperforms Popper in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 75). Popper leads in best practices.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Popper

Choose Popper when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3295 audited HSTS sites and 156 audited Popper sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Popper?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 49 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Popper?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 69 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Popper?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (90 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Popper?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Popper?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (403 ms vs 418 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Popper for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback