Skip to content

HSTS vs PubSubJS

Based on 3016 and 25 real audits

View HSTS details | View PubSubJS details
MetricHSTSPubSubJSWinner
Performance5244HSTS
Accessibility8992PubSubJS
Best Practices8991PubSubJS
SEO9190HSTS
Security7264HSTS
TTFB385ms239msPubSubJS
Composite7773HSTS
Performance
HSTS
52
PubSubJS
44
Accessibility
HSTS
89
PubSubJS
92
Security
HSTS
72
PubSubJS
64
SEO
HSTS
91
PubSubJS
90
Composite
HSTS
77
PubSubJS
73

HSTS outperforms PubSubJS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 73). PubSubJS leads in accessibility, best practices, TTFB.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose PubSubJS

Choose PubSubJS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3016 audited HSTS sites and 25 audited PubSubJS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or PubSubJS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 44 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or PubSubJS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (72 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or PubSubJS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor PubSubJS (92 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or PubSubJS?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or PubSubJS?
PubSubJS sites show lower Time to First Byte (239 ms vs 385 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or PubSubJS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback