Skip to content

HSTS vs PubSubJS

Based on 2556 and 24 real audits

View HSTS details | View PubSubJS details
MetricHSTSPubSubJSWinner
Performance4943HSTS
Accessibility8992PubSubJS
Best Practices8890PubSubJS
SEO9190HSTS
Security7064HSTS
TTFB364ms213msPubSubJS
Composite7573HSTS
Performance
HSTS
49
PubSubJS
43
Accessibility
HSTS
89
PubSubJS
92
Security
HSTS
70
PubSubJS
64
SEO
HSTS
91
PubSubJS
90
Composite
HSTS
75
PubSubJS
73

HSTS outperforms PubSubJS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). PubSubJS leads in accessibility, best practices, TTFB.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose PubSubJS

Choose PubSubJS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2556 audited HSTS sites and 24 audited PubSubJS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or PubSubJS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 43 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or PubSubJS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or PubSubJS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor PubSubJS (92 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or PubSubJS?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or PubSubJS?
PubSubJS sites show lower Time to First Byte (213 ms vs 364 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or PubSubJS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback