Skip to content

HSTS vs Pushpad

Based on 2599 and 1 real audits

MetricHSTSPushpadWinner
Performance4844HSTS
Accessibility89100Pushpad
Best Practices8896Pushpad
SEO91100Pushpad
Security7065HSTS
TTFB365ms504msHSTS
Composite7574HSTS
Performance
HSTS
48
Pushpad
44
Accessibility
HSTS
89
Pushpad
100
Security
HSTS
70
Pushpad
65
SEO
HSTS
91
Pushpad
100
Composite
HSTS
75
Pushpad
74

HSTS outperforms Pushpad in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Pushpad leads in accessibility, best practices, SEO.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Pushpad

Choose Pushpad when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2599 audited HSTS sites and 1 audited Pushpad sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Pushpad?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 44 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Pushpad?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Pushpad?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Pushpad (100 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Pushpad?
Pushpad sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Pushpad?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (365 ms vs 504 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Pushpad for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback