Skip to content

HSTS vs Quill

Based on 3105 and 13 real audits

View HSTS details | View Quill details
MetricHSTSQuillWinner
Performance5231HSTS
Accessibility9076HSTS
Best Practices8992Quill
SEO9287HSTS
Security7371HSTS
TTFB396ms409msHSTS
Composite7774HSTS
Performance
HSTS
52
Quill
31
Accessibility
HSTS
90
Quill
76
Security
HSTS
73
Quill
71
SEO
HSTS
92
Quill
87
Composite
HSTS
77
Quill
74

HSTS outperforms Quill in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 74). Quill leads in best practices.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Quill

Choose Quill when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3105 audited HSTS sites and 13 audited Quill sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Quill?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 31 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Quill?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 71 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Quill?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (90 vs 76). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Quill?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 87 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Quill?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (396 ms vs 409 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Quill for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback