Skip to content

HSTS vs Razorpay

Based on 3294 and 1 real audits

View HSTS details | View Razorpay details
MetricHSTSRazorpayWinner
Performance538HSTS
Accessibility9080HSTS
Best Practices89100Razorpay
SEO9291HSTS
Security7378Razorpay
TTFB403ms78msRazorpay
Composite7878Tie
Performance
HSTS
53
Razorpay
8
Accessibility
HSTS
90
Razorpay
80
Security
HSTS
73
Razorpay
78
SEO
HSTS
92
Razorpay
91
Composite
HSTS
78
Razorpay
78

HSTS and Razorpay are closely matched, each leading in different categories. HSTS has a composite score of 78 while Razorpay scores 78.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Razorpay

Choose Razorpay when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3294 audited HSTS sites and 1 audited Razorpay sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Razorpay?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (53 vs 8 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Razorpay?
Razorpay sites score higher on security analysis (78 vs 73 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Razorpay?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (90 vs 80). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Razorpay?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Razorpay?
Razorpay sites show lower Time to First Byte (78 ms vs 403 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Razorpay for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback