Based on 2492 and 14 real audits
| Metric | HSTS | React Native for Web | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 48 | 35 | HSTS |
| Accessibility | 89 | 82 | HSTS |
| Best Practices | 88 | 95 | React Native for Web |
| SEO | 91 | 90 | HSTS |
| Security | 69 | 67 | HSTS |
| TTFB | 357ms | 687ms | HSTS |
| Composite | 75 | 72 | HSTS |
HSTS outperforms React Native for Web in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 72). React Native for Web leads in best practices.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose React Native for Web when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2492 audited HSTS sites and 14 audited React Native for Web sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback