Based on 2599 and 16 real audits
| Metric | HSTS | React Native for Web | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 48 | 35 | HSTS |
| Accessibility | 89 | 83 | HSTS |
| Best Practices | 88 | 94 | React Native for Web |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | React Native for Web |
| Security | 70 | 69 | HSTS |
| TTFB | 365ms | 617ms | HSTS |
| Composite | 75 | 73 | HSTS |
HSTS outperforms React Native for Web in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). React Native for Web leads in best practices, SEO.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose React Native for Web when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2599 audited HSTS sites and 16 audited React Native for Web sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback