Skip to content

HSTS vs Redux

Based on 2556 and 24 real audits

View HSTS details | View Redux details
MetricHSTSReduxWinner
Performance4956Redux
Accessibility8984HSTS
Best Practices8893Redux
SEO9190HSTS
Security7070Tie
TTFB364ms546msHSTS
Composite7575Tie
Performance
HSTS
49
Redux
56
Accessibility
HSTS
89
Redux
84
Security
HSTS
70
Redux
70
SEO
HSTS
91
Redux
90
Composite
HSTS
75
Redux
75

HSTS outperforms Redux in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 75). Redux leads in performance, best practices.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Redux

Choose Redux when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2556 audited HSTS sites and 24 audited Redux sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Redux?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Redux sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (56 vs 49 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Redux?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 70 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Redux?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Redux?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Redux?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (364 ms vs 546 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Redux for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Redux scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback