| Metric | HSTS | Refersion | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 49 | 44 | HSTS |
| Accessibility | 89 | 77 | HSTS |
| Best Practices | 88 | 78 | HSTS |
| SEO | 91 | 100 | Refersion |
| Security | 70 | 68 | HSTS |
| TTFB | 364ms | 503ms | HSTS |
| Composite | 75 | 72 | HSTS |
HSTS outperforms Refersion in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 72). Refersion leads in SEO.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Refersion when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2556 audited HSTS sites and 3 audited Refersion sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback