Skip to content

HSTS vs RequireJS

Based on 3369 and 92 real audits

View HSTS details | View RequireJS details
MetricHSTSRequireJSWinner
Performance5344HSTS
Accessibility9085HSTS
Best Practices8987HSTS
SEO9291HSTS
Security7468HSTS
TTFB411ms370msRequireJS
Composite7875HSTS
Performance
HSTS
53
RequireJS
44
Accessibility
HSTS
90
RequireJS
85
Security
HSTS
74
RequireJS
68
SEO
HSTS
92
RequireJS
91
Composite
HSTS
78
RequireJS
75

HSTS outperforms RequireJS in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 75). RequireJS leads in TTFB.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose RequireJS

Choose RequireJS when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3369 audited HSTS sites and 92 audited RequireJS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or RequireJS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (53 vs 44 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or RequireJS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (74 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or RequireJS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (90 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or RequireJS?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or RequireJS?
RequireJS sites show lower Time to First Byte (370 ms vs 411 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or RequireJS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback