Skip to content

HSTS vs RequireJS

Based on 3016 and 77 real audits

View HSTS details | View RequireJS details
MetricHSTSRequireJSWinner
Performance5243HSTS
Accessibility8984HSTS
Best Practices8985HSTS
SEO9190HSTS
Security7266HSTS
TTFB385ms385msTie
Composite7773HSTS
Performance
HSTS
52
RequireJS
43
Accessibility
HSTS
89
RequireJS
84
Security
HSTS
72
RequireJS
66
SEO
HSTS
91
RequireJS
90
Composite
HSTS
77
RequireJS
73

HSTS outperforms RequireJS in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 73). RequireJS leads in no categories.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose RequireJS

RequireJS doesn't clearly lead HSTS in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3016 audited HSTS sites and 77 audited RequireJS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or RequireJS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 43 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or RequireJS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (72 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or RequireJS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or RequireJS?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or RequireJS?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (385 ms vs 385 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or RequireJS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback