Skip to content

HSTS vs Riskified

Based on 2556 and 6 real audits

View HSTS details | View Riskified details
MetricHSTSRiskifiedWinner
Performance4925HSTS
Accessibility8993Riskified
Best Practices8882HSTS
SEO9190HSTS
Security7069HSTS
TTFB364ms529msHSTS
Composite7571HSTS
Performance
HSTS
49
Riskified
25
Accessibility
HSTS
89
Riskified
93
Security
HSTS
70
Riskified
69
SEO
HSTS
91
Riskified
90
Composite
HSTS
75
Riskified
71

HSTS outperforms Riskified in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 71). Riskified leads in accessibility.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Riskified

Choose Riskified when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2556 audited HSTS sites and 6 audited Riskified sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Riskified?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 25 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Riskified?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 69 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Riskified?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Riskified (93 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Riskified?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Riskified?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (364 ms vs 529 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Riskified for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback