Skip to content

HSTS vs Scorpion

Based on 2488 and 1 real audits

View HSTS details | View Scorpion details
MetricHSTSScorpionWinner
Performance4856Scorpion
Accessibility8971HSTS
Best Practices87100Scorpion
SEO91100Scorpion
Security6978Scorpion
TTFB354ms1351msHSTS
Composite7581Scorpion
Performance
HSTS
48
Scorpion
56
Accessibility
HSTS
89
Scorpion
71
Security
HSTS
69
Scorpion
78
SEO
HSTS
91
Scorpion
100
Composite
HSTS
75
Scorpion
81

Scorpion outperforms HSTS in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (81 vs 75). HSTS leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Scorpion

Choose Scorpion when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2488 audited HSTS sites and 1 audited Scorpion sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Scorpion?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Scorpion sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (56 vs 48 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Scorpion?
Scorpion sites score higher on security analysis (78 vs 69 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Scorpion?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 71). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Scorpion?
Scorpion sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Scorpion?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (354 ms vs 1351 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Scorpion for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Scorpion scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback