Skip to content

HSTS vs Segment

Based on 2488 and 100 real audits

View HSTS details | View Segment details
MetricHSTSSegmentWinner
Performance4836HSTS
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8785HSTS
SEO9192Segment
Security6966HSTS
TTFB354ms226msSegment
Composite7573HSTS
Performance
HSTS
48
Segment
36
Accessibility
HSTS
89
Segment
89
Security
HSTS
69
Segment
66
SEO
HSTS
91
Segment
92
Composite
HSTS
75
Segment
73

HSTS outperforms Segment in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Segment leads in SEO, TTFB.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Segment

Choose Segment when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2488 audited HSTS sites and 100 audited Segment sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Segment?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Segment?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Segment?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Segment?
Segment sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Segment?
Segment sites show lower Time to First Byte (226 ms vs 354 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Segment for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback