Based on 3294 and 1 real audits
| Metric | HSTS | Segment Consent Manager | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 53 | 68 | Segment Consent Manager |
| Accessibility | 90 | 85 | HSTS |
| Best Practices | 89 | 96 | Segment Consent Manager |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 73 | 64 | HSTS |
| TTFB | 403ms | 421ms | HSTS |
| Composite | 78 | 79 | Segment Consent Manager |
HSTS and Segment Consent Manager are closely matched, each leading in different categories. HSTS has a composite score of 78 while Segment Consent Manager scores 79.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Segment Consent Manager when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3294 audited HSTS sites and 1 audited Segment Consent Manager sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback