Skip to content

HSTS vs Sirvoy

Based on 2853 and 12 real audits

View HSTS details | View Sirvoy details
MetricHSTSSirvoyWinner
Performance5055Sirvoy
Accessibility8995Sirvoy
Best Practices8898Sirvoy
SEO9188HSTS
Security7171Tie
TTFB369ms202msSirvoy
Composite7678Sirvoy
Performance
HSTS
50
Sirvoy
55
Accessibility
HSTS
89
Sirvoy
95
Security
HSTS
71
Sirvoy
71
SEO
HSTS
91
Sirvoy
88
Composite
HSTS
76
Sirvoy
78

Sirvoy outperforms HSTS in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 76). HSTS leads in SEO.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Sirvoy

Choose Sirvoy when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2853 audited HSTS sites and 12 audited Sirvoy sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Sirvoy?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Sirvoy sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (55 vs 50 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Sirvoy?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (71 vs 71 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Sirvoy?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Sirvoy (95 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Sirvoy?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 88 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Sirvoy?
Sirvoy sites show lower Time to First Byte (202 ms vs 369 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Sirvoy for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Sirvoy scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback