Skip to content

HSTS vs Smartocto

Based on 2420 and 1 real audits

View HSTS details | View Smartocto details
MetricHSTSSmartoctoWinner
Performance4728HSTS
Accessibility8983HSTS
Best Practices8888Tie
SEO91100Smartocto
Security6976Smartocto
TTFB354ms122msSmartocto
Composite7578Smartocto
Performance
HSTS
47
Smartocto
28
Accessibility
HSTS
89
Smartocto
83
Security
HSTS
69
Smartocto
76
SEO
HSTS
91
Smartocto
100
Composite
HSTS
75
Smartocto
78

Smartocto outperforms HSTS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 75). HSTS leads in performance, accessibility.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Smartocto

Choose Smartocto when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2420 audited HSTS sites and 1 audited Smartocto sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Smartocto?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (47 vs 28 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Smartocto?
Smartocto sites score higher on security analysis (76 vs 69 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Smartocto?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 83). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Smartocto?
Smartocto sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Smartocto?
Smartocto sites show lower Time to First Byte (122 ms vs 354 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Smartocto for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback