Skip to content

HSTS vs spin.js

Based on 2556 and 10 real audits

View HSTS details | View spin.js details
MetricHSTSspin.jsWinner
Performance4949Tie
Accessibility8985HSTS
Best Practices8885HSTS
SEO9192spin.js
Security7061HSTS
TTFB364ms266msspin.js
Composite7572HSTS
Performance
HSTS
49
spin.js
49
Accessibility
HSTS
89
spin.js
85
Security
HSTS
70
spin.js
61
SEO
HSTS
91
spin.js
92
Composite
HSTS
75
spin.js
72

HSTS outperforms spin.js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 72). spin.js leads in SEO, TTFB.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose spin.js

Choose spin.js when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2556 audited HSTS sites and 10 audited spin.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or spin.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 49 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or spin.js?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 61 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or spin.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or spin.js?
spin.js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or spin.js?
spin.js sites show lower Time to First Byte (266 ms vs 364 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or spin.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback