Skip to content

HSTS vs SpotX

Based on 3295 and 2 real audits

View HSTS details | View SpotX details
MetricHSTSSpotXWinner
Performance5230HSTS
Accessibility9089HSTS
Best Practices8979HSTS
SEO9288HSTS
Security7373Tie
TTFB403ms335msSpotX
Composite7873HSTS
Performance
HSTS
52
SpotX
30
Accessibility
HSTS
90
SpotX
89
Security
HSTS
73
SpotX
73
SEO
HSTS
92
SpotX
88
Composite
HSTS
78
SpotX
73

HSTS outperforms SpotX in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 73). SpotX leads in TTFB.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose SpotX

Choose SpotX when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3295 audited HSTS sites and 2 audited SpotX sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or SpotX?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 30 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or SpotX?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 73 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or SpotX?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (90 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or SpotX?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 88 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or SpotX?
SpotX sites show lower Time to First Byte (335 ms vs 403 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or SpotX for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback