Skip to content

HSTS vs Stackable

Based on 3294 and 1 real audits

View HSTS details | View Stackable details
MetricHSTSStackableWinner
Performance5271Stackable
Accessibility9092Stackable
Best Practices89100Stackable
SEO92100Stackable
Security7361HSTS
TTFB403ms383msStackable
Composite7878Tie
Performance
HSTS
52
Stackable
71
Accessibility
HSTS
90
Stackable
92
Security
HSTS
73
Stackable
61
SEO
HSTS
92
Stackable
100
Composite
HSTS
78
Stackable
78

Stackable outperforms HSTS in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 78). HSTS leads in security.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Stackable

Choose Stackable when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3294 audited HSTS sites and 1 audited Stackable sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Stackable?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Stackable sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (71 vs 52 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Stackable?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 61 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Stackable?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Stackable (92 vs 90). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Stackable?
Stackable sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Stackable?
Stackable sites show lower Time to First Byte (383 ms vs 403 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Stackable for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Stackable scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback