| Metric | HSTS | Tagboard | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 52 | 32 | HSTS |
| Accessibility | 90 | 96 | Tagboard |
| Best Practices | 89 | 92 | Tagboard |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 73 | 64 | HSTS |
| TTFB | 403ms | 39ms | Tagboard |
| Composite | 78 | 73 | HSTS |
HSTS and Tagboard are closely matched, each leading in different categories. HSTS has a composite score of 78 while Tagboard scores 73.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Tagboard when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3295 audited HSTS sites and 1 audited Tagboard sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback