| Metric | HSTS | Tealium | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 49 | 36 | HSTS |
| Accessibility | 89 | 91 | Tealium |
| Best Practices | 88 | 84 | HSTS |
| SEO | 91 | 89 | HSTS |
| Security | 70 | 64 | HSTS |
| TTFB | 364ms | 372ms | HSTS |
| Composite | 75 | 72 | HSTS |
HSTS outperforms Tealium in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 72). Tealium leads in accessibility.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Tealium when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2556 audited HSTS sites and 57 audited Tealium sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback