Skip to content

HSTS vs theCut

Based on 2557 and 3 real audits

View HSTS details | View theCut details
MetricHSTStheCutWinner
Performance4931HSTS
Accessibility8987HSTS
Best Practices8896theCut
SEO9197theCut
Security7061HSTS
TTFB364ms111mstheCut
Composite7573HSTS
Performance
HSTS
49
theCut
31
Accessibility
HSTS
89
theCut
87
Security
HSTS
70
theCut
61
SEO
HSTS
91
theCut
97
Composite
HSTS
75
theCut
73

HSTS outperforms theCut in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). theCut leads in best practices, SEO, TTFB.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose theCut

Choose theCut when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2557 audited HSTS sites and 3 audited theCut sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or theCut?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 31 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or theCut?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 61 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or theCut?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or theCut?
theCut sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (97 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or theCut?
theCut sites show lower Time to First Byte (111 ms vs 364 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or theCut for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback