Skip to content

HSTS vs theCut

Based on 2214 and 3 real audits

View HSTS details | View theCut details
MetricHSTStheCutWinner
Performance4631HSTS
Accessibility8887HSTS
Best Practices8796theCut
SEO9097theCut
Security6861HSTS
TTFB343ms111mstheCut
Composite7473HSTS
Performance
HSTS
46
theCut
31
Accessibility
HSTS
88
theCut
87
Security
HSTS
68
theCut
61
SEO
HSTS
90
theCut
97
Composite
HSTS
74
theCut
73

HSTS outperforms theCut in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). theCut leads in best practices, SEO, TTFB.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose theCut

Choose theCut when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2214 audited HSTS sites and 3 audited theCut sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or theCut?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (46 vs 31 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or theCut?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 61 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or theCut?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (88 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or theCut?
theCut sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (97 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or theCut?
theCut sites show lower Time to First Byte (111 ms vs 343 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or theCut for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback