Skip to content

HSTS vs Three.js

Based on 30 and 1 real audits

View HSTS details | View Three.js details
MetricHSTSThree.jsWinner
Performance8928HSTS
Accessibility9271HSTS
Best Practices8292Three.js
SEO9785HSTS
Security9057HSTS
TTFB671ms248msThree.js
Composite8867HSTS
Performance
HSTS
89
Three.js
28
Accessibility
HSTS
92
Three.js
71
Security
HSTS
90
Three.js
57
SEO
HSTS
97
Three.js
85
Composite
HSTS
88
Three.js
67

HSTS outperforms Three.js in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (88 vs 67). Three.js leads in best practices, TTFB.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Three.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (89 vs 28 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Three.js?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (90 vs 57 on average).
Should I choose HSTS or Three.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on performance while HSTS may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback