| Metric | HSTS | Tiny Slider | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 49 | 46 | HSTS |
| Accessibility | 89 | 93 | Tiny Slider |
| Best Practices | 88 | 89 | Tiny Slider |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 70 | 61 | HSTS |
| TTFB | 364ms | 388ms | HSTS |
| Composite | 75 | 74 | HSTS |
HSTS outperforms Tiny Slider in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Tiny Slider leads in accessibility, best practices.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Tiny Slider when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2556 audited HSTS sites and 5 audited Tiny Slider sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback