| Metric | HSTS | TrafficStars | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 53 | 48 | HSTS |
| Accessibility | 90 | 77 | HSTS |
| Best Practices | 89 | 86 | HSTS |
| SEO | 92 | 76 | HSTS |
| Security | 73 | 73 | Tie |
| TTFB | 403ms | 294ms | TrafficStars |
| Composite | 78 | 77 | HSTS |
HSTS outperforms TrafficStars in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 77). TrafficStars leads in TTFB.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is SEO and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose TrafficStars when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3294 audited HSTS sites and 4 audited TrafficStars sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback