Skip to content

HSTS vs Turbo

Based on 3098 and 6 real audits

View HSTS details | View Turbo details
MetricHSTSTurboWinner
Performance5273Turbo
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8998Turbo
SEO9292Tie
Security7368HSTS
TTFB397ms133msTurbo
Composite7779Turbo
Performance
HSTS
52
Turbo
73
Accessibility
HSTS
89
Turbo
89
Security
HSTS
73
Turbo
68
SEO
HSTS
92
Turbo
92
Composite
HSTS
77
Turbo
79

Turbo outperforms HSTS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 77). HSTS leads in security.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Turbo

Choose Turbo when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3098 audited HSTS sites and 6 audited Turbo sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Turbo?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Turbo sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (73 vs 52 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Turbo?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Turbo?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Turbo?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Turbo?
Turbo sites show lower Time to First Byte (133 ms vs 397 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Turbo for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Turbo scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback