Skip to content

HSTS vs Turbopack

Based on 3294 and 192 real audits

View HSTS details | View Turbopack details
MetricHSTSTurbopackWinner
Performance5354Turbopack
Accessibility9092Turbopack
Best Practices8992Turbopack
SEO9295Turbopack
Security7375Turbopack
TTFB403ms565msHSTS
Composite7880Turbopack
Performance
HSTS
53
Turbopack
54
Accessibility
HSTS
90
Turbopack
92
Security
HSTS
73
Turbopack
75
SEO
HSTS
92
Turbopack
95
Composite
HSTS
78
Turbopack
80

Turbopack outperforms HSTS in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 78). HSTS leads in TTFB.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Turbopack

Choose Turbopack when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3294 audited HSTS sites and 192 audited Turbopack sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Turbopack?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Turbopack sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (54 vs 53 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Turbopack?
Turbopack sites score higher on security analysis (75 vs 73 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Turbopack?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Turbopack (92 vs 90). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Turbopack?
Turbopack sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (95 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Turbopack?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (403 ms vs 565 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Turbopack for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Turbopack scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback