Skip to content

HSTS vs Turbopack

Based on 2492 and 114 real audits

View HSTS details | View Turbopack details
MetricHSTSTurbopackWinner
Performance4844HSTS
Accessibility8991Turbopack
Best Practices8889Turbopack
SEO9194Turbopack
Security6969Tie
TTFB357ms296msTurbopack
Composite7575Tie
Performance
HSTS
48
Turbopack
44
Accessibility
HSTS
89
Turbopack
91
Security
HSTS
69
Turbopack
69
SEO
HSTS
91
Turbopack
94
Composite
HSTS
75
Turbopack
75

Turbopack outperforms HSTS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 75). HSTS leads in performance.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Turbopack

Choose Turbopack when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2492 audited HSTS sites and 114 audited Turbopack sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Turbopack?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 44 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Turbopack?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 69 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Turbopack?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Turbopack (91 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Turbopack?
Turbopack sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Turbopack?
Turbopack sites show lower Time to First Byte (296 ms vs 357 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Turbopack for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback