Skip to content

HSTS vs Upserve

Based on 3294 and 1 real audits

View HSTS details | View Upserve details
MetricHSTSUpserveWinner
Performance5288Upserve
Accessibility9097Upserve
Best Practices8992Upserve
SEO9292Tie
Security7388Upserve
TTFB403ms73msUpserve
Composite7884Upserve
Performance
HSTS
52
Upserve
88
Accessibility
HSTS
90
Upserve
97
Security
HSTS
73
Upserve
88
SEO
HSTS
92
Upserve
92
Composite
HSTS
78
Upserve
84

Upserve outperforms HSTS in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (84 vs 78). HSTS leads in no categories.

When to choose HSTS

HSTS doesn't clearly lead Upserve in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose Upserve

Choose Upserve when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3294 audited HSTS sites and 1 audited Upserve sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Upserve?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Upserve sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (88 vs 52 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Upserve?
Upserve sites score higher on security analysis (88 vs 73 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Upserve?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Upserve (97 vs 90). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Upserve?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Upserve?
Upserve sites show lower Time to First Byte (73 ms vs 403 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Upserve for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Upserve scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback