Skip to content

HSTS vs Userback

Based on 3294 and 2 real audits

View HSTS details | View Userback details
MetricHSTSUserbackWinner
Performance5258Userback
Accessibility9094Userback
Best Practices8982HSTS
SEO9296Userback
Security7368HSTS
TTFB403ms98msUserback
Composite7875HSTS
Performance
HSTS
52
Userback
58
Accessibility
HSTS
90
Userback
94
Security
HSTS
73
Userback
68
SEO
HSTS
92
Userback
96
Composite
HSTS
78
Userback
75

Userback outperforms HSTS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 78). HSTS leads in best practices, security, composite score.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Userback

Choose Userback when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3294 audited HSTS sites and 2 audited Userback sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Userback?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Userback sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (58 vs 52 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Userback?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Userback?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Userback (94 vs 90). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Userback?
Userback sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (96 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Userback?
Userback sites show lower Time to First Byte (98 ms vs 403 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Userback for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Userback scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback