Skip to content

HSTS vs Vercel

Based on 2488 and 109 real audits

View HSTS details | View Vercel details
MetricHSTSVercelWinner
Performance4848Tie
Accessibility8992Vercel
Best Practices8791Vercel
SEO9194Vercel
Security6969Tie
TTFB354ms362msHSTS
Composite7576Vercel
Performance
HSTS
48
Vercel
48
Accessibility
HSTS
89
Vercel
92
Security
HSTS
69
Vercel
69
SEO
HSTS
91
Vercel
94
Composite
HSTS
75
Vercel
76

Vercel outperforms HSTS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 75). HSTS leads in TTFB.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Vercel

Choose Vercel when your primary concern is best practices and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2488 audited HSTS sites and 109 audited Vercel sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Vercel?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 48 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Vercel?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 69 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Vercel?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Vercel (92 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Vercel?
Vercel sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Vercel?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (354 ms vs 362 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Vercel for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback