Skip to content

HSTS vs Webpack

Based on 2488 and 955 real audits

View HSTS details | View Webpack details
MetricHSTSWebpackWinner
Performance4838HSTS
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8787Tie
SEO9192Webpack
Security6966HSTS
TTFB354ms304msWebpack
Composite7573HSTS
Performance
HSTS
48
Webpack
38
Accessibility
HSTS
89
Webpack
89
Security
HSTS
69
Webpack
66
SEO
HSTS
91
Webpack
92
Composite
HSTS
75
Webpack
73

HSTS outperforms Webpack in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Webpack leads in SEO, TTFB.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Webpack

Choose Webpack when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2488 audited HSTS sites and 955 audited Webpack sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Webpack?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Webpack?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Webpack?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Webpack?
Webpack sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Webpack?
Webpack sites show lower Time to First Byte (304 ms vs 354 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Webpack for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback