Skip to content

HSTS vs X-Clacks-Overhead

Based on 121 and 2 real audits

View HSTS details | View X-Clacks-Overhead details
MetricHSTSX-Clacks-OverheadWinner
Performance4841HSTS
Accessibility9193X-Clacks-Overhead
Best Practices8984HSTS
SEO9391HSTS
Security6873X-Clacks-Overhead
TTFB416ms345msX-Clacks-Overhead
Composite7576X-Clacks-Overhead
Performance
HSTS
48
X-Clacks-Overhead
41
Accessibility
HSTS
91
X-Clacks-Overhead
93
Security
HSTS
68
X-Clacks-Overhead
73
SEO
HSTS
93
X-Clacks-Overhead
91
Composite
HSTS
75
X-Clacks-Overhead
76

X-Clacks-Overhead outperforms HSTS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 75). HSTS leads in performance, best practices, SEO.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or X-Clacks-Overhead?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or X-Clacks-Overhead?
X-Clacks-Overhead sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 68 on average).
Should I choose HSTS or X-Clacks-Overhead for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on performance while HSTS may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback