Skip to content

HSTS vs Yandex.Metrika

Based on 3016 and 52 real audits

View HSTS details | View Yandex.Metrika details
MetricHSTSYandex.MetrikaWinner
Performance5246HSTS
Accessibility8973HSTS
Best Practices8987HSTS
SEO9191Tie
Security7265HSTS
TTFB385ms417msHSTS
Composite7772HSTS
Performance
HSTS
52
Yandex.Metrika
46
Accessibility
HSTS
89
Yandex.Metrika
73
Security
HSTS
72
Yandex.Metrika
65
SEO
HSTS
91
Yandex.Metrika
91
Composite
HSTS
77
Yandex.Metrika
72

HSTS outperforms Yandex.Metrika in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 72). Yandex.Metrika leads in no categories.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Yandex.Metrika

Yandex.Metrika doesn't clearly lead HSTS in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3016 audited HSTS sites and 52 audited Yandex.Metrika sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Yandex.Metrika?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 46 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Yandex.Metrika?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (72 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Yandex.Metrika?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 73). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Yandex.Metrika?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Yandex.Metrika?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (385 ms vs 417 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Yandex.Metrika for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback