| Metric | HSTS | Zendesk | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 54 | 42 | HSTS |
| Accessibility | 90 | 87 | HSTS |
| Best Practices | 90 | 90 | Tie |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | HSTS |
| Security | 74 | 70 | HSTS |
| TTFB | 421ms | 424ms | HSTS |
| Composite | 78 | 75 | HSTS |
HSTS outperforms Zendesk in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 75). Zendesk leads in no categories.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Zendesk doesn't clearly lead HSTS in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 3637 audited HSTS sites and 23 audited Zendesk sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback