Skip to content

HSTS vs Zipkin

Based on 2556 and 10 real audits

View HSTS details | View Zipkin details
MetricHSTSZipkinWinner
Performance4939HSTS
Accessibility8991Zipkin
Best Practices8890Zipkin
SEO9189HSTS
Security7069HSTS
TTFB364ms273msZipkin
Composite7575Tie
Performance
HSTS
49
Zipkin
39
Accessibility
HSTS
89
Zipkin
91
Security
HSTS
70
Zipkin
69
SEO
HSTS
91
Zipkin
89
Composite
HSTS
75
Zipkin
75

HSTS and Zipkin are closely matched, each leading in different categories. HSTS has a composite score of 75 while Zipkin scores 75.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Zipkin

Choose Zipkin when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2556 audited HSTS sites and 10 audited Zipkin sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Zipkin?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Zipkin?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 69 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Zipkin?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Zipkin (91 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Zipkin?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Zipkin?
Zipkin sites show lower Time to First Byte (273 ms vs 364 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Zipkin for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback