Based on 2601 and 2 real audits
| Metric | HSTS | Zoho PageSense | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 48 | 41 | HSTS |
| Accessibility | 89 | 73 | HSTS |
| Best Practices | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Zoho PageSense |
| Security | 70 | 74 | Zoho PageSense |
| TTFB | 365ms | 675ms | HSTS |
| Composite | 75 | 78 | Zoho PageSense |
HSTS and Zoho PageSense are closely matched, each leading in different categories. HSTS has a composite score of 75 while Zoho PageSense scores 78.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Zoho PageSense when your primary concern is security and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2601 audited HSTS sites and 2 audited Zoho PageSense sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback