Skip to content

HTTP/3 vs LiteSpeed

Based on 1448 and 46 real audits

View HTTP/3 details | View LiteSpeed details
MetricHTTP/3LiteSpeedWinner
Performance5154LiteSpeed
Accessibility8888Tie
Best Practices8890LiteSpeed
SEO9092LiteSpeed
Security6871LiteSpeed
TTFB283ms730msHTTP/3
Composite7578LiteSpeed
Performance
HTTP/3
51
LiteSpeed
54
Accessibility
HTTP/3
88
LiteSpeed
88
Security
HTTP/3
68
LiteSpeed
71
SEO
HTTP/3
90
LiteSpeed
92
Composite
HTTP/3
75
LiteSpeed
78

LiteSpeed outperforms HTTP/3 in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 75). HTTP/3 leads in TTFB.

When to choose HTTP/3

Choose HTTP/3 when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose LiteSpeed

Choose LiteSpeed when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1448 audited HTTP/3 sites and 46 audited LiteSpeed sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HTTP/3 or LiteSpeed?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, LiteSpeed sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (54 vs 51 on average).
Which has better security, HTTP/3 or LiteSpeed?
LiteSpeed sites score higher on security analysis (71 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HTTP/3 or LiteSpeed?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HTTP/3 (88 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HTTP/3 or LiteSpeed?
LiteSpeed sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HTTP/3 or LiteSpeed?
HTTP/3 sites show lower Time to First Byte (283 ms vs 730 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HTTP/3 or LiteSpeed for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. LiteSpeed scores higher on overall composite score while HTTP/3 may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback