Skip to content

HTTP/3 vs Polyfill

Based on 44 and 1 real audits

View HTTP/3 details | View Polyfill details
MetricHTTP/3PolyfillWinner
Performance3746Polyfill
Accessibility9190HTTP/3
Best Practices87100Polyfill
SEO9277HTTP/3
Security6669Polyfill
TTFB351ms14msPolyfill
Composite7478Polyfill
Performance
HTTP/3
37
Polyfill
46
Accessibility
HTTP/3
91
Polyfill
90
Security
HTTP/3
66
Polyfill
69
SEO
HTTP/3
92
Polyfill
77
Composite
HTTP/3
74
Polyfill
78

Polyfill outperforms HTTP/3 in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 74). HTTP/3 leads in accessibility, SEO.

FAQ

Which is faster, HTTP/3 or Polyfill?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Polyfill sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (46 vs 37 on average).
Which has better security, HTTP/3 or Polyfill?
Polyfill sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 66 on average).
Should I choose HTTP/3 or Polyfill for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Polyfill scores higher on performance while HTTP/3 may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback