Skip to content

HTTP/3 vs PWA

Based on 1448 and 111 real audits

View HTTP/3 details | View PWA details
MetricHTTP/3PWAWinner
Performance5139HTTP/3
Accessibility8888Tie
Best Practices8883HTTP/3
SEO9092PWA
Security6867HTTP/3
TTFB283ms325msHTTP/3
Composite7574HTTP/3
Performance
HTTP/3
51
PWA
39
Accessibility
HTTP/3
88
PWA
88
Security
HTTP/3
68
PWA
67
SEO
HTTP/3
90
PWA
92
Composite
HTTP/3
75
PWA
74

HTTP/3 outperforms PWA in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). PWA leads in SEO.

When to choose HTTP/3

Choose HTTP/3 when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose PWA

Choose PWA when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1448 audited HTTP/3 sites and 111 audited PWA sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HTTP/3 or PWA?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HTTP/3 sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (51 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, HTTP/3 or PWA?
HTTP/3 sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HTTP/3 or PWA?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HTTP/3 (88 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HTTP/3 or PWA?
PWA sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HTTP/3 or PWA?
HTTP/3 sites show lower Time to First Byte (283 ms vs 325 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HTTP/3 or PWA for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HTTP/3 scores higher on overall composite score while HTTP/3 may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback