Skip to content

HTTP/3 vs SuperPWA

Based on 1542 and 1 real audits

View HTTP/3 details | View SuperPWA details
MetricHTTP/3SuperPWAWinner
Performance5167SuperPWA
Accessibility8894SuperPWA
Best Practices88100SuperPWA
SEO9092SuperPWA
Security6960HTTP/3
TTFB305ms693msHTTP/3
Composite7576SuperPWA
Performance
HTTP/3
51
SuperPWA
67
Accessibility
HTTP/3
88
SuperPWA
94
Security
HTTP/3
69
SuperPWA
60
SEO
HTTP/3
90
SuperPWA
92
Composite
HTTP/3
75
SuperPWA
76

SuperPWA outperforms HTTP/3 in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 75). HTTP/3 leads in security, TTFB.

When to choose HTTP/3

Choose HTTP/3 when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose SuperPWA

Choose SuperPWA when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1542 audited HTTP/3 sites and 1 audited SuperPWA sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HTTP/3 or SuperPWA?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, SuperPWA sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (67 vs 51 on average).
Which has better security, HTTP/3 or SuperPWA?
HTTP/3 sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 60 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HTTP/3 or SuperPWA?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor SuperPWA (94 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HTTP/3 or SuperPWA?
SuperPWA sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HTTP/3 or SuperPWA?
HTTP/3 sites show lower Time to First Byte (305 ms vs 693 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HTTP/3 or SuperPWA for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. SuperPWA scores higher on overall composite score while HTTP/3 may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback