Skip to content

HTTP/3 vs WordPress.com

Based on 1646 and 10 real audits

View HTTP/3 details | View WordPress.com details
MetricHTTP/3WordPress.comWinner
Performance5263WordPress.com
Accessibility8890WordPress.com
Best Practices8896WordPress.com
SEO9194WordPress.com
Security7067HTTP/3
TTFB321ms232msWordPress.com
Composite7678WordPress.com
Performance
HTTP/3
52
WordPress.com
63
Accessibility
HTTP/3
88
WordPress.com
90
Security
HTTP/3
70
WordPress.com
67
SEO
HTTP/3
91
WordPress.com
94
Composite
HTTP/3
76
WordPress.com
78

WordPress.com outperforms HTTP/3 in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 76). HTTP/3 leads in security.

When to choose HTTP/3

Choose HTTP/3 when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose WordPress.com

Choose WordPress.com when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1646 audited HTTP/3 sites and 10 audited WordPress.com sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HTTP/3 or WordPress.com?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, WordPress.com sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (63 vs 52 on average).
Which has better security, HTTP/3 or WordPress.com?
HTTP/3 sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HTTP/3 or WordPress.com?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor WordPress.com (90 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HTTP/3 or WordPress.com?
WordPress.com sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HTTP/3 or WordPress.com?
WordPress.com sites show lower Time to First Byte (232 ms vs 321 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HTTP/3 or WordPress.com for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. WordPress.com scores higher on overall composite score while HTTP/3 may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback