Skip to content

HubSpot Analytics vs Swiftype

Based on 98 and 2 real audits

View HubSpot Analytics details | View Swiftype details
MetricHubSpot AnalyticsSwiftypeWinner
Performance3530HubSpot Analytics
Accessibility8893Swiftype
Best Practices8084Swiftype
SEO8992Swiftype
Security6563HubSpot Analytics
TTFB304ms279msSwiftype
Composite7371HubSpot Analytics
Performance
HubSpot Analytics
35
Swiftype
30
Accessibility
HubSpot Analytics
88
Swiftype
93
Security
HubSpot Analytics
65
Swiftype
63
SEO
HubSpot Analytics
89
Swiftype
92
Composite
HubSpot Analytics
73
Swiftype
71

Swiftype outperforms HubSpot Analytics in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 73). HubSpot Analytics leads in performance, security, composite score.

When to choose HubSpot Analytics

Choose HubSpot Analytics when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Swiftype

Choose Swiftype when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 98 audited HubSpot Analytics sites and 2 audited Swiftype sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HubSpot Analytics or Swiftype?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HubSpot Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (35 vs 30 on average).
Which has better security, HubSpot Analytics or Swiftype?
HubSpot Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HubSpot Analytics or Swiftype?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Swiftype (93 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HubSpot Analytics or Swiftype?
Swiftype sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HubSpot Analytics or Swiftype?
Swiftype sites show lower Time to First Byte (279 ms vs 304 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HubSpot Analytics or Swiftype for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HubSpot Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while HubSpot Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback