Skip to content

HubSpot vs Open Graph

Based on 148 and 3358 real audits

MetricHubSpotOpen GraphWinner
Performance3745Open Graph
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8387Open Graph
SEO9092Open Graph
Security6566Open Graph
TTFB288ms358msHubSpot
Composite7374Open Graph
Performance
HubSpot
37
Open Graph
45
Accessibility
HubSpot
89
Open Graph
89
Security
HubSpot
65
Open Graph
66
SEO
HubSpot
90
Open Graph
92
Composite
HubSpot
73
Open Graph
74

Open Graph outperforms HubSpot in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). HubSpot leads in TTFB.

When to choose HubSpot

Choose HubSpot when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 148 audited HubSpot sites and 3358 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HubSpot or Open Graph?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 37 on average).
Which has better security, HubSpot or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HubSpot or Open Graph?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HubSpot (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HubSpot or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HubSpot or Open Graph?
HubSpot sites show lower Time to First Byte (288 ms vs 358 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HubSpot or Open Graph for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Open Graph scores higher on overall composite score while HubSpot may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback