Skip to content

HubSpot vs Open Graph

Based on 164 and 4433 real audits

MetricHubSpotOpen GraphWinner
Performance3749Open Graph
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8488Open Graph
SEO9193Open Graph
Security6770Open Graph
TTFB281ms430msHubSpot
Composite7477Open Graph
Performance
HubSpot
37
Open Graph
49
Accessibility
HubSpot
89
Open Graph
89
Security
HubSpot
67
Open Graph
70
SEO
HubSpot
91
Open Graph
93
Composite
HubSpot
74
Open Graph
77

Open Graph outperforms HubSpot in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 74). HubSpot leads in TTFB.

When to choose HubSpot

Choose HubSpot when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 164 audited HubSpot sites and 4433 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HubSpot or Open Graph?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 37 on average).
Which has better security, HubSpot or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HubSpot or Open Graph?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HubSpot (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HubSpot or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HubSpot or Open Graph?
HubSpot sites show lower Time to First Byte (281 ms vs 430 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HubSpot or Open Graph for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Open Graph scores higher on overall composite score while HubSpot may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback