Skip to content

Hugo vs Linode/Akamai

Based on 30 and 2 real audits

View Hugo details | View Linode/Akamai details
MetricHugoLinode/AkamaiWinner
Performance71100Linode/Akamai
Accessibility8973Hugo
Best Practices9596Linode/Akamai
SEO9091Linode/Akamai
Security6766Hugo
TTFB238ms759msHugo
Composite7775Hugo
Performance
Hugo
71
Linode/Akamai
100
Accessibility
Hugo
89
Linode/Akamai
73
Security
Hugo
67
Linode/Akamai
66
SEO
Hugo
90
Linode/Akamai
91
Composite
Hugo
77
Linode/Akamai
75

Hugo outperforms Linode/Akamai in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 75). Linode/Akamai leads in performance, best practices, SEO.

FAQ

Which is faster, Hugo or Linode/Akamai?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Linode/Akamai sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (100 vs 71 on average).
Which has better security, Hugo or Linode/Akamai?
Hugo sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Should I choose Hugo or Linode/Akamai for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Linode/Akamai scores higher on performance while Hugo may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback