Skip to content

iGoDigital vs Microsoft

Based on 2 and 2445 real audits

View iGoDigital details | View Microsoft details
MetriciGoDigitalMicrosoftWinner
Performance3139Microsoft
Accessibility9889iGoDigital
Best Practices7986Microsoft
SEO9289iGoDigital
Security6467Microsoft
TTFB212ms328msiGoDigital
Composite7273Microsoft
Performance
iGoDigital
31
Microsoft
39
Accessibility
iGoDigital
98
Microsoft
89
Security
iGoDigital
64
Microsoft
67
SEO
iGoDigital
92
Microsoft
89
Composite
iGoDigital
72
Microsoft
73

Microsoft outperforms iGoDigital in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). iGoDigital leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.

When to choose iGoDigital

Choose iGoDigital when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2 audited iGoDigital sites and 2445 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, iGoDigital or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Microsoft sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 31 on average).
Which has better security, iGoDigital or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, iGoDigital or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor iGoDigital (98 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, iGoDigital or Microsoft?
iGoDigital sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), iGoDigital or Microsoft?
iGoDigital sites show lower Time to First Byte (212 ms vs 328 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose iGoDigital or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Microsoft scores higher on overall composite score while iGoDigital may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback