Skip to content

iGoDigital vs New Relic

Based on 2 and 177 real audits

View iGoDigital details | View New Relic details
MetriciGoDigitalNew RelicWinner
Performance3135New Relic
Accessibility9889iGoDigital
Best Practices7985New Relic
SEO9290iGoDigital
Security6465New Relic
TTFB212ms236msiGoDigital
Composite7272Tie
Performance
iGoDigital
31
New Relic
35
Accessibility
iGoDigital
98
New Relic
89
Security
iGoDigital
64
New Relic
65
SEO
iGoDigital
92
New Relic
90
Composite
iGoDigital
72
New Relic
72

iGoDigital and New Relic are closely matched, each leading in different categories. iGoDigital has a composite score of 72 while New Relic scores 72.

When to choose iGoDigital

Choose iGoDigital when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose New Relic

Choose New Relic when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2 audited iGoDigital sites and 177 audited New Relic sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, iGoDigital or New Relic?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, New Relic sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (35 vs 31 on average).
Which has better security, iGoDigital or New Relic?
New Relic sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, iGoDigital or New Relic?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor iGoDigital (98 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, iGoDigital or New Relic?
iGoDigital sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), iGoDigital or New Relic?
iGoDigital sites show lower Time to First Byte (212 ms vs 236 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose iGoDigital or New Relic for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. New Relic scores higher on overall composite score while iGoDigital may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback