| Metric | IIS | Microsoft IIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 50 | 45 | IIS |
| Accessibility | 88 | 87 | IIS |
| Best Practices | 86 | 85 | IIS |
| SEO | 91 | 90 | IIS |
| Security | 68 | 67 | IIS |
| TTFB | 519ms | 547ms | IIS |
| Composite | 74 | 72 | IIS |
IIS outperforms Microsoft IIS in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Microsoft IIS leads in no categories.
Choose IIS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Microsoft IIS doesn't clearly lead IIS in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 80 audited IIS sites and 72 audited Microsoft IIS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback